I ran across this graphic from a paper called
Character and Leadership: Situating Servant Leadership in A Proposed Virtues Framework,
co-authored by Jim Lanctot and Dr. Justin Irving. Something about it
immediately tingled my “clear thinking sense” (like Spidey sense, but
more cerebral), so of course I had to investigate. The paper itself, I
discovered, wasn’t badly done. It presents a reasonable layout of what
may be considered basic virtues, not necessarily the ones I consider
most important, but definitely virtues. It also provides reasonable
definitions for those virtues. What bothered me about it was the chart
of “The Virtue Continuum.”
Here is the figure:
Some problems stand out. It is hard to see how one could have an excess of integrity, or how such
an excess would lead to legalism. Wouldn’t legalism be the result of an
overly enthusiastic respect of the rules, in other words, an
insufficient respect for persons? The last item, courage, may indeed
lead to foolhardiness, but if temperance is the practice of moderation,
how is strictness due to too much temperance?
[Continue reading at
Chiefy's Word.]